But I listen the whistle in the first turbo.
Jaguar is madness
But I listen the whistle in the first turbo.OK.
In the meanwhile I found some other information. MAF A belongs to bank 1 belongs to the second turbo. So it is the MAF on top. Not the MAF at the bottom, which reports high values.
Hello Dirk! Sorry for the delay, I was busy.It's curious. But let's ignore it and go on with our brain
What I need next is the following. But take your time. I will be offline for the next hours
1. Engine Off. Ingnition on. Clear all fault codes.
- value ambient temperature + air intake temperature + air charge temperature + engine temperatur + air flow rate MAF1 & MAF2 + Exhaust gas recirculation valve position bank 1 & 2 + Engine speed
- status of RP
- fault codes
2. Ingnition on. Clear all fault codes. Turn on engine. Engine idling for 20 seconds and than:
- value ambient temperature + air intake temperature + air charge temperature + engine temperatur + air flow rate MAF1 & MAF2 + Exhaust gas recirculation valve position bank 1 & 2 + Engine speed
- status of RP
- fault codes
Dirk
Yes, the unit es g/s!Hi Sergio,
thanks for the values. They are plausible
Ambient temperature 27°C -> Real temperature? Today I have 24°C outside. But 27°C might be ok, if the car is parked in the sun.
MAF1 = MAF Bank 2 = MAF at the bottom = MAF with 4 cables = MAF with Charge Air Temperature
=> Temperature readings are plausibel. They correlate with the voltage. It is a PTC. Lower temperature = Lower resistance = higher sensor voltage value. Temperature is ok.
=> Air flow rate with engine off is ok.
=> Air flow rate while idling is not ok. Could you check the unit? Is it g/s? The value should be around 18 g/s.
MAF2 = MAF Bank 1 = MAF at the top = MAF with 3 cables = MAF without temperature values
=> Air flow rate with engine off is ok.
=> Air flow rate while idling is not ok. Much too high.
=> Option 1: MAF2 is defective. Can be checked with another MAF. Swap them and check their readings
=> Option 2: Leak in the intake hose after MAF2.
=> Option 3: Second turbo bypass valve is open (number 5 in the dawing of Hamed post -> Bypass No5
EGR seems to react normal. So you can focus on the air intake system and the MAFs.
I have an old MAF in my cellar. If you want to have it for analysis, you can borrow it. But I need it back afterwards. It is my MAF for analysis
Cheers
Dirk
The air filter is new, I installed one not the ago. Do you mean put paper between the filter and the MAF?Maybe it is no leak. Maybe it is more simpleMaybe both MAF are defective....bet let's hope for a leak.
Did you check the motor air filter ?
Even MAF 1 has no good values while idling. It is 1 g/s but it should be 18 g/s.
You can do a lot of checks without a garage. You need a jack and 2 axle stands. You can jack up the car high enough to get under it and check the hoses that you can't reach from bonnet. To check all the intake hoses is not very complicated, but you will need to remove several hoses under the bonnet. You don't need a smoke tester for this job. But a smoke tester would be much easier.
I don't have one and I checked my hoses by hand and eyes.
I guess your MAFs are defective. But that's my best guess.
I recommend the following tests.
Take some newspapers and block the intake of MAF 2 on the top. Start the engine and read the air flow rate of MAF 1 and 2.
If MAF 2 is still reporting a value above 0.5 g/s
You will either find big hole directly after MAF 2 or MAF2 is simply defective.
After that you can remove the motor air filter and block the complete air intake inside the filter housing. Start the engine and read the air flow rates of MAF 1 + 2. They both should be near 0.2 g/s.
Rude but easy tests
Cheers
Dirk
I would say, yesNew update:
I put paper in both holes between the air filter and MAFs, and I have also swapped the MAFs for checking the results:
All the problems are in the first turbo, because first turbo is called “bank 2”
First try with the MAF in the top covered:
View attachment 197137
second try with the MAF in the bottom:
View attachment 197138
I really think I have a leak
And how is that possible, when the first thing that I did was change the MAF in the bottom one month ago?![]()
I love it
Remember what I said?defective MAFs
Dirk
I will do it tomorrow!I know what you mean. It happend to me several times in my car-life. With my Audi A4 my garage changed the servo-pump for the power steering three times within 2 days. 2 spare parts from ZF were defective. The third pump was ok.
Simply bad luck.
Could you take a video with the whistle?
Dirk
My manifolds are ok, at least until I can reach to seeReading this with interest. 3.0 engine RP issues are very often cracked plastic inlet manifolds. Has the OP eliminated this as a cause of the problem?
Thanks for the reminder. OP checked this twice.Reading this with interest. 3.0 engine RP issues are very often cracked plastic inlet manifolds. Has the OP eliminated this as a cause of the problem?